Learning and Teaching Plan 2003-2005
Preamble
Many staff and students have been involved in the development of the Plan. Extensive consultation then took place across faculties and campuses and with staff and students generally. I would like to thank all of those who participated for their enthusiasm and commitment.
The Plan provides a 'blueprint' to guide all areas of the university in addressing the challenges identified.
The successful implementation of the Plan will depend on the support and active engagement of all areas of the university and all members of the university community. Working together will enable us to strengthen and maintain high academic standards, the nexus between teaching research, and high quality learning and teaching at Monash.
The implementation process will involve a number of university committees and working parties, and all organisational units of the university. However, the primary locus of implementation, in the sense of directly impacting upon and improving learning and teaching at Monash, will be the faculties and their courses.
Thus faculty planning and budget allocation processes will be a key mechanism for implementation. As an additional measure, the funds in the Teaching and Learning Pool will be distributed to faculties to support special LTP initiatives.
- Professor Alan Lindsay
Introduction
Monash University has reaffirmed in Leading the Way Monash 2020 that its key, defining themes are Innovation , Engagement and Internationalisation . The overarching aim of the strategic planning process is to ensure that we maintain and improve our competitive position in the volatile, global environment of higher education and that we continue to improve both our reputation and the quality of our academic programs. The Learning and Teaching Plan is the university's major planning activity to achieve these aims in learning and teaching. In this overview of the Learning and Teaching Plan, a series of objectives and strategies are presented to guide the development of learning and teaching policies and practices at Monash.
Monash values in learning and teaching
The fundamental ideal of excellence in scholarship [1] must be the underpinning value of all of our educational programs. Whilst the university values and takes great pride in the excellence of the teaching of its staff it is a key responsibility of all university staff to act as positive role models by embracing the highest standards of scholarship and academic excellence: 'We need scholars who not only skillfully explore the frontiers of knowledge, but who integrate ideas, connect thought to action, and inspire students' [2]. The Monash experience will foster a love of learning and an inquiring mind in each of its students. We expect our students to challenge accepted wisdom and to engage fully with an aspiration to excellence and a commitment to life long learning. We expect and encourage our students to be active learners and to participate in the design and improvement of our academic programs.
We have a social obligation to produce graduates who are able to make a positive contribution to the communities in which they live and work. Although much of what a university teaches is often directed to producing employable graduates, we must encourage students to broaden their education through elective subjects that can be drawn from a broad range of faculties and discipline areas.
High quality learning and teaching
Monash has a long-established, well-deserved reputation for high quality learning and teaching. The report from the university's recent Institutional Self Review "Still Learning" provided spirited and insightful comment and advice on the university's strategic planning directions that relate to the Learning and Teaching Plan. It reiterated the need for us to be able to define and identify high quality teaching and learning (Objective A: Strategy A1). We must also be able to measure progress and improvements in the quality of our educational programs (Objective C).
Assessment
Monash has a commitment to maintaining high academic standards sustained by quality learning and teaching. In order to be assured that we are achieving these commitments, it is vital that we have assessment processes that are reliable, appropriate, valid and practical. Approaches to assessment must aspire to measure the learning outcomes that units and courses expound. Monash has developed a clearly articulated Assessment Policy as part of the Academic Policy Bank, as well as a set of related policies and procedures. The time has now come to review and update our assessment related policies and practices, with a view to ensuring that assessment helps us to set the appropriate standards that will ensure high quality learning (Strategy A2). Monash has an extensive array of assessment practices that operate across different discipline areas. We will implement those updated policies to ensure that a consistent approach to assessment policies and practices is embraced (Strategy B2).
Monash graduate attributes
All Monash educational programs are guided by, and structured to satisfy, a set of learning objectives that will be in part specific to the particular discipline or discipline areas that are the underpinning of each particular educational program. Monash has defined a set of Monash Graduate Attributes, which encompass more generic aspects of knowledge, skills and attitudes. We will update and expand the Monash Graduate Attributes, and we will identify ways to improve the achievement of those Graduate Attributes (Strategy A3).
Faculties will develop plans to ensure that the Monash Graduate Attributes can be demonstrably taught and assessed within each of their award courses. It is to be expected that many courses will also have discipline-specific Graduate Attributes that will be defined within their course objectives. We will ensure that a Monash context can be brought to bear on those specific requirements.
Teaching-research nexus
It is axiomatic that the twin core activities of the university, teaching and research must be the cornerstone of policy development and direction within the university. We are a university only because we are engaged in teaching and research. The nexus between teaching and research is often cited, but rarely well defined. Our research activities will both inform and enrich our curriculum and our teaching approach. This can only be achieved when there is strong linkage between the research and teaching of the university. We will define and identify the relationships between research and teaching, particularly as they inform and affect teaching (Strategies A4 and A5).
Quality cycle
Monash reaffirms its ongoing commitment to quality learning and teaching. We will further develop our strategies to systematically improve the quality of learning and teaching (Objective B). This outcome will be attained by identifying and implementing measures of quality and performance in order to facilitate the quality process (Strategy B1) . We will also further develop robust, reliable and valid instruments for assessing high quality teaching and learning.
The adoption of appropriate performance indicators and benchmarks will become an increasingly important part of learning and teaching. Developing ways of using that information to inform the necessary feedback process required for quality improvement will be a major priority (Strategy B4). We will also provide support and rewards to our staff to encourage an improvement in learning and teaching (Strategy B3), and at the university level, we will share the information about successes and good practice across the institution (Strategy B5).
Student-centredness
Monash reaffirms its on-going commitment to student-centred learning. The dimension of student-centredness has been defined as "emphasizing the importance of students' active participation in their learning: building on previous learning in developing new skills and understandings: fostering the desire and skills to continue learning: and taking responsibility for self-directed learning". [3] Student centredness also implies that approaches to curriculum design and delivery will be informed by students' learning needs rather than the convenience and preferences of academics. Nonetheless, student-centredness can only be effectively achieved when staff are fully committed to the idea, and are prepared to take a leadership role in changing the educational environment to one that is more student-centred.
High quality student centred learning can be difficult to measure, since it requires some established and accepted standards of quality. The diverse learning programs of the university may mean that quality is defined differently in different cognate areas. We will assess our progress in achieving high quality student-centred teaching and learning (Objective C) by developing indicators of quality in student centredness and in the quality of teaching. More importantly, we will develop a culture of use of those indicators in implementing improvements (Strategy C1).
Flexibility
Flexibility has become a more important aspect of learning and teaching policy as the diversity within the student population at Monash continues to increase. The 'flexible' dimension of learning can be defined as "seek(ing) to increase the learners' choices of: methods and timing of interaction with teachers and other students without diminishing the quality of that interaction; place and time of learning; course modules (award structures and pathways); entry and exit conditions; and access to administrative and student learning support. " [4]
Monash is committed to continuing to increase flexibility in its approaches to learning and teaching (Objective D) . We particularly need to consider flexibility in entry points into the university and its offerings, in the types of awards that are available, in different pathways through courses, in multiple exit points, and in different forms of course delivery (Strategy D1) . By moving towards a more flexible learning environment in these ways, the needs of students may be better served and educational outcomes may be improved.
We will consider how flexible delivery of programs can be further developed to include an increase in the delivery of programs where appropriate by distributed learning and multi-modal learning (Strategy D2) . Flexibility is not without cost. We will develop a strategic plan for distributed and multi-modal learning that includes a financial dimension. DEST defines multi-modal learning as where ' at least one unit of study is undertaken on an internal mode of attendance and at least one unit of study is undertaken on an external mode of attendance'. [5] We will provide student support services at the university, campus, faculty, school and department level that address the issues that affect all aspects of student life at Monash. (Strategy D2).
We will assess progress in achieving improved levels of flexibility (Objective E) . This can be achieved by creating a standard reporting process so that flexibility in courses and units can be reported across the university in a consistent way (Strategy E1). Faculties will then be asked to report on how they have engaged with flexibility in their course and units (Strategy E2).
Technology supported learning and teaching
The use of technology in education, including information and communication technologies (ICT), has become both one of the largest changes and one of the key agents of change in the university environment. We will continuously monitor developments in the use of technology to support learning (Objective F) and review the progress and quality of the use of technology to achieve better learning outcomes (Strategy F1).
We must also expect more changes in the use of technology to support learning and teaching, as new technologies emerge and as yet unexpected opportunities to enhance learning by the use of technology become apparent. Monash will be well positioned to make rational, well informed strategic decisions (Strategy F2) to adopt or reject new technologies related to learning and teaching.
The desirable outcomes of technologically supported learning can only be achieved if the staff of the university are supported and rewarded for participating in the introduction and establishment of best practice innovation in ICT-supported learning. We will support and offer appropriate professional development for staff in technology supported learning and we will develop appropriate recognition and rewards for staff who engage in innovations in the development or implementation of technology supported learning (Strategy F3).
Internationalisation
A truly international perspective is now called for to fully understand and appreciate the complexities of the modern world, with its richness of cultural, linguistic and religious diversity. We will ensure that we develop approaches to learning and teaching that demonstrate an awareness and sensitivity to cultural diversity (Objective I). Monash acknowledges the wide range of definitions of internationalisation, but will arrive at its own definitions and determine practical ways to apply its definitions of internationalisation (Objective G: Strategy G1). Monash will prepare its students appropriately for the new world environment, where international perspectives and the ability to work with and in a range of different cultures, will be highly desirable graduate attributes (Strategy A3).
We will continue to foster and develop international partnerships to support our teaching and learning activities and to maximize the opportunities for international understanding and experiences for our staff and students. We will improve the opportunities for physical exchanges of staff and students by facilitating interactions with international partners (Objective J).
We will ensure that internationalisation is incorporated into curriculum design and delivery processes (Objective H) . Internationalising the curriculum will go further than incorporating international comparisons into a standard Australian curriculum, or substituting local for Australian examples in one of Monash's trans-national programs. We will embrace the development of curricula that are appropriate to each individual local environment in which we operate, particularly when considering the delivery of programs off-shore. Curriculum content will not arise out of a singular cultural base, but will recognize and engage with the global plurality of sources of knowledge. Students will be encouraged to explore how knowledge is produced, distributed and used globally.
The way forward
The strategies and actions identified in this Plan will be implemented between 2003 and 2005, although clearly some of the outcomes of the plan will be ongoing activities. The University Education Committee will have a central role in the coordination and monitoring of the implementation of the Plan. Faculties will be expected to include strategies in their own operational plans that will allow them to achieve the relevant objectives from the Learning and Teaching Plan. The Academic Support Network and other organisational units within the university will also need to respond to the Learning and Teaching Plan in their own planning processes.
Objectives, strategies and actions
A: To define and recognise high quality learning and teaching at Monash.
| Objectives |
Strategies |
Actions |
Responsibilities and Timelines |
A:1 |
Produce a report which describes high quality learning and teaching at Monash including the values underpinning it.
Faculty Operational Plans and/or Learning and Teaching Plans build on and contribute to Monash's approach to high quality learning and teaching. |
Education Committee working group informed by CeLTS and CHEQ to produce a report that defines and recognizes high quality learning and teaching at Monash.
Reviewed and updated biannually. Incorporate this strategy with scheduled course and academic reviews. |
Education Committee working group with advice and support from CeLTS, CHEQ will produce a report by September 2003 |
A:2 |
Review and update the Assessment policy and associated policies, with particular emphasis on standards, moderation and validity. |
Education Committee to appoint a working group, including members with specific expertise in assessment, from faculties and support services. |
Education Committee working group comprising members from faculties, CeLTS, CHEQ will produce a report recommending amendments to the Assessment policy by April 2004. |
A:3 |
Plan, map, implement, review and evaluate a set of Monash Graduate Attributes incorporating the ability to work and study in an International context. |
Education Committee to appoint a group to undertake these tasks including members from faculties and support services.
Faculties to incorporate these attributes into their units and courses. |
Education Committee working group with input from faculties, CeLTS, CHEQ, Student and Staff Services and the Library will complete each of these tasks.
Ongoing from January 2003 --2005 |
A:4 |
Identify how Monash defines and implements the teaching/research nexus. |
CHEQ will produce a discussion paper for Academic Board on the teaching/research nexus.
CHEQ will undertake a benchmarking project to analyse methods of implementing the teaching/research nexus.
Faculties will appoint working groups to produce a report on how Monash will achieve a nexus between teaching and research in their courses. |
CHEQ by December 2002.
CHEQ by December 2003.
Faculties will produce a report with advice and support from CeLTS and CHEQ. By January 2004.
|
A:5 |
Support and encourage staff to develop approaches to teaching that are informed by research. |
Faculty working groups will develop a professional development plan to provide advice and support to staff on ways that teaching can be informed by research.
Faculty working groups will assist staff to develop portfolios demonstrating how they achieve a nexus between teaching and research in their courses. These portfolios may include case studies reflecting on practice, publications and or conference presentations.
HEDU will develop a forum for exchange of exemplary models of how staff attain a nexus between teaching and research in their courses. |
Faculty working groups with input from CeLTS, and CHEQ will produce a plan by January 2004.
Faculty working groups with input from MRGS, CeLTS and CHEQ. Ongoing from January 2003-December 2005.
HEDU, Faculties, with input from MRGS, and CHEQ by July 2003.
|
B: To improve the quality of learning, teaching and assessment at Monash.
| Objectives |
Strategies |
Actions |
Responsibilities and Timelines |
B:1 |
Faculties to systematically use the Quality Cycle in developing and reviewing their learning and teaching. |
Monitor and review the use of the Quality Cycle in course development and delivery. |
Faculty Education Committees and Quality Management Groups with advice from CHEQ and CeLTS.
Annual report to Education committee |
B:2 |
Faculties to align their Assessment Policies and practices with the updated University Assessment Policy. |
Faculties to report on the alignment of their assessment policies with the updated University Assessment policy. |
Faculty Education Committees
Report to Education committee November 2004 |
B:3 |
Faculties to provide support, recognition and rewards to improve learning, teaching and assessment, including professional development, access to grants, mentors and peer review of teaching and courseware. |
Monitor, review and evaluate improvements in learning, teaching and assessment. |
Deans, Faculty Education Committees, ADTs with support from CeLTS, CHEQ.
January 2003 --December 2005. |
B:4 |
Faculties to gather and use feedback from all stakeholders especially information provided by students on the quality of learning, teaching and assessment in their unit evaluations. |
Develop mechanisms to gather feedback from stakeholders on the quality of learning teaching and assessment and ensure that feedback is conveyed to relevant staff. |
Deans, Faculty Education Committees, ADTs with support from CHEQ and Student Associations.
January 2003 --2005 |
B:5 |
To develop and disseminate information on quality learning, teaching and assessment throughout the university. |
Develop a forum to exchange best practice models of learning, teaching and assessment. |
CADeT, with input from Faculty Education Committees, Quality Management Groups ADTs with support from CHEQ and CeLTS.
March 2003 -- December 2005 |
C: To continuously review progress in achieving high quality learning, teaching and assessment, ensuring that feedback occurs to improve practice in these areas.
| Objectives |
Strategies |
Actions |
Responsibilities and Timelines |
C:1 |
Develop indicators for student centered learning, teaching and assessment. Apply indicators to units and courses; analyse results of evaluations and implement changes. |
Faculty Education Committees, ADTs with assistance from CADeT CHEQ, and CeLTS will develop quality indicators for unit and course evaluation and apply these indicators. |
CADeT, ADTs, CHEQ, CeLTS
March 2003 --December 2005 |
D: To develop additional forms of flexibility in courses.
| Objectives |
Strategies |
Actions |
Responsibilities and Timelines |
D:1 |
Review the role and success of flexible pathways and delivery in current degree courses and identify and develop appropriate additional options. |
Education Committee working party in consultation with Faculties will review course flexibility options, enhancing them where appropriate. |
Education Committee, Faculty Education Committees, ADTs with CeLTS
March 2003 -- November 2003. |
D:2 |
Develop a strategic plan for multi-modal and distributed learning, informed by research and including the provision of support services. |
Deputy Vice Chancellor (Academic and Planning) will develop a strategic plan for multi-modal learning, including a financial plan. |
DVC (Academic and Planning) with assistance from Marketing and Public Affairs, CeLTS.
January 2004 |
E: To assess progress in achieving improved levels of flexibility in courses.
| Objectives |
Strategies |
Actions |
Responsibilities and Timelines |
E:1 |
Create and disseminate a standard reporting process so that flexibility in courses/units can be uniformly reported. |
Creation of an agreed set of definitions and indicators of flexibility in a standard format. |
Education Committee
November 2003 |
E:2 |
Identify the degree of flexibility appropriate to each course and category of student cohort and implement changes in courses that reflect these findings. |
Faculty Education Committees in consultation with ADTs and Course Co-ordinators will decide on levels of flexibility suitable for each course and student cohort within their faculty. |
Faculty Education Committee, with support from CeLTS and the Library.
Annual report to Education Committee November 2003. |
F: To monitor developments and continuously review the progress, quality and learning outcomes of Technology Supported Learning.
| Objectives |
Strategies |
Actions |
Responsibilities and Timelines |
F:1 |
Establish a body to undertake research about and facilitate the implementation of Technology Supported Learning. |
Produce an accessible critical review of Technology Supported Learning activities and outcomes across the university. |
Flexibility Subcommittee of Education Committee including input from Faculties, Academic Support Network (CeLTS, Information Technology Services and Library).
March 2003. |
F:2 |
Identify new and existing modes of technology supported learning |
Conduct an audit of courses to identify modes of technology supported learning and undertake research to identify new methods of implementing technology supported learning. |
Flexibility Subcommittee of Education Committee and working groups with input from ITS, Library, CeLTS and CHEQ and Faculty Education Committees.
January 2004. |
F:3 |
Evaluate pedagogies for technology supported learning to determine value, impact cost and effectiveness.
Develop specific projects, actions and protocols that facilitate technology supported learning. |
Identify examples of best practice in technology supported learning; construct a database of technologies and staff experience in technology supported learning; formalise and coordinate staff development and rewards for effective use of technology supported learning. |
Flexibility Subcommittee of Education Committee and working groups with input from Faculties, ADTs, Course Coordinators, and the Academic Support Network.
July 2003 |
G: To develop understandings of Internationalisation of the Curriculum.
| Objectives |
Strategies |
Actions |
Responsibilities and Timelines |
G:1 |
To develop a broad and inclusive definition of Internationalisation of the Curriculum and explore its relationship with Cultural Diversity. |
Prepare a report that defines Internationalisation of the Curriculum and Cultural Diversity and recommend pedagogies that incorporate these concepts. |
Internationalisation Working Party
July 2003. |
H: To ensure that Internationalisation of the Curriculum is incorporated in curriculum design, delivery and assessment practices.
| Objectives |
Strategies |
Actions |
Responsibilities and Timelines |
H:1 |
Faculty based working groups be established to assist the development of courses and to explore ways of implementing strategies. |
Establish working groups to audit courses for Internationalisation. |
Faculty Education Committees, ADTs, Course Coordinators with input from staff on all Monash campuses.
December 2003 |
I: To ensure that the development and delivery of learning, teaching and assessment demonstrates an awareness of and sensitivity towards cultural diversity.
| Objectives |
Strategies |
Actions |
Responsibilities and Timelines |
I:1 |
Produce a curriculum development package to assist the audit of existing units and the development of new units from the perspective of cultural inclusivity. |
HEDU, LLSU to work with Faculties to design a curriculum development package for Internationalisation of the Curriculum. |
HEDU, Faculties, ADTs, LLSU
July 2003 -- December 2005. |
I:2 |
Conduct professional development for staff to increase awareness of the norms of various cultural groups. |
HEDU and LLSU to work with Faculties to design and deliver professional development programs on cultural diversity. |
HEDU, Faculties, ADTs, Associate Deans International to commence delivery of programs from July 2003 onwards. |
J: To provide opportunities for students to study and for staff to work in other countries.
| Objectives |
Strategies |
Actions |
Responsibilities and Timelines |
J:1 |
Coordinate a program of scholarships and exchanges for staff and students in international universities, research or commercial organizations |
Deputy Vice Chancellor (Academic and Planning) to sponsor the project with assistance from HEDU, Human Resources and Monash Abroad. |
DVC (Academic and Planning), HEDU, Human Resources, Monash Abroad.
July 2003 -- December 2005. |
Footnotes
1 In this context 'scholarship is given its broader more capacious meaning, one that brings legitimacy to the full scope of academic work...specifically [including these] four functions : the scholarship of discovery, the scholarship of integration; the scholarship of application and the scholarship of teaching' Boyer Ernest L (1990) Scholarship Reconsidered, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton. p.16.
2 Ibid, p.77.
3 Monash University (1999) Learning and Teaching Plan: 2000-2002 , p.4
4 Monash University (1999) Learning and Teaching Plan: 2000-2002 , p.4
5 DEST (2001) Students 2001: Selected Higher Education Statistics Appendix 3 Definitions, p.48.
|