Project outputs

Latest Publications

‘Screening should not be based on ability to pay’: Australian healthcare providers' and consumers' perspectives on public funding for non-invasive prenatal testing

Pynaker, C., Johnston, M., Mills, C., Vasey, K., Taylor-Sands, M., Bowman-Smart, H. and Hui, L. (2025), ‘Screening should not be based on ability to pay’: Australian healthcare providers' and consumers' perspectives on public funding for non-invasive prenatal testing. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13915

2024

2023

Taylor-Sands M, Warton C, Bowman-Smart H. Regulating non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal sex determination. Medical Law Review. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwad014

Marks IR, Mills C, Devolder K. Unconditional access to non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for adult-onset conditions: a defence. Journal of Medical Ethics 2023. https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2023/05/02/jme-2023-109070

Warton, C, Johnston, M, & Mills, C. Reproductive deliberation: Supporting autonomous decision making in prenatal genetic counselling. J Genet Couns. 2023 https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1682

2022

Johnston, M, Warton, C, Pertile, MD, et al. Ethical issues associated with prenatal screening using non-invasive prenatal testing for sex chromosome aneuploidy. Prenat Diagn. 2022; 1- 9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6217

Monash Bioethics Centre

Arts

Project outputs

Latest Publications

‘Screening should not be based on ability to pay’: Australian healthcare providers' and consumers' perspectives on public funding for non-invasive prenatal testing

2024

Disparities in integrating non-invasive prenatal testing into antenatal healthcare in Australia: a survey of healthcare professionals

NIPT for adult‐onset conditions: Australian NIPT users' views

Should the scope of NIPT be limited by a ‘threshold of seriousness’?