Modern Slavery Statement
Five year plan View
We have a five-year plan to address modern slavery within our global, complex, operations and supply chain – with a clearly defined governance structure supported by an expert advisory panel. We recognise that as this plan is executed, it needs to remain responsive to new lessons and dynamic in execution. We continue to learn, adjust and improve our plan, even in the early stages of our five year program of work. Like many other companies and institutions, our understanding of modern slavery, and this five-year plan, will continue to evolve, develop and grow.
- Supporting procurement systems and processes
- Basic tracking system
- Internal risk assessments
- Initial risk assessments
- Compliance monitoring
- Onshore training
- Advanced tracking system
- Cleaning and electronics – deep dive
- Compliance monitoring
- Offshore 100% owned and controlled entities
- Onshore research & education
- Offshore less than 100% owned controlled entities
- Expanded compliance monitoring
- Initial offshore training
- Onshore continuous improvement
- Offshore research and education
- Expanded offshore training
- Continuous improvement
- Program review
Working with our suppliers View
We recognise that we cannot do this alone – it requires accountability and a sustained effort in conjunction with our suppliers, partners and the wider Monash University community.
Our suppliers vary from common goods and services to some of the most specialised suppliers worldwide that support Monash’s leading research projects. The University also undertakes research in a multitude of remote areas across the world.
After a thorough consultation process with key suppliers and stakeholders throughout the University, we are now implementing the following actions to assess and address operational and supply risk.
All new suppliers must confirm they are compliant with relevant modern slavery requirements as part of Monash’s supplier onboarding process. They are not able to be paid until they have completed this process, including electronically confirming they are compliant with all relevant obligations. A failure to confirm compliance stops the onboarding process and initiates manual intervention and review. A supplier that has not been successfully onboarded is unable to be paid.
A robust framework of template wording has been created for implementation in key formal template agreements (where Monash is procuring goods or services). These are being continuously improved as our program of work progresses. In addition, Monash provides comprehensive written responses to all queries from third parties seeking to clarify the Monash component of their supply chain or as part of sponsorship and funding applications.
Recognising the wide diversity of Monash’s global supply chain, an additional supplier questionnaire has been created. This includes clear expressions of requirements and guided steps in English. This is used in conjunction with dialogue to achieve an understanding of the supplier’s practice and culture and to identify the best way to work in partnership with suppliers, beginning with directly-engaged suppliers.
Using risk assessments, industry and academic knowledge, Monash has identified the initial areas within its supply chain that are considered to be of higher potential risk. Our new technology solution for 2022 will seek to delve even deeper into our suppliers, and their suppliers. We are also taking into consideration recommendations of high risk areas from the Department of Home Affairs and the Global Slavery Index and other recognised sources, to create a fact-based list of high risk areas. We then prioritise and increase our focus on these areas.
Listening to and dealing with concerns View
As required, a suite of methods is used to delve into high-risk areas, including, but not limited to:
- ‘deep-dive’-type analyses.
- bespoke supplier assessments.
- engagement of third-party consultants or agents who specialise in industry best-practice to provide reports which may include them undertaking them onshore or offshore site visits or staff discussions, as required.
- tabling concerns through the Modern Slavery Steering Committee governance structure for guidance on targeted actions and effectiveness measures.
Current areas of spend that have been identified as high risk include apparel, fish, rice, cocoa, electronics, hospitality, cleaning services and conflict minerals used in electronics. The measures taken to manage risks and potential risk in these areas are identified below. Additional areas of focus have been identified and are in the process of review.
Garments and apparel
Monash University requests information from suppliers to identify those that may not be in compliance with their legal obligations such as the Fair Work Act 2009, and encourages suppliers and/or their supply chain to comply with industry codes such as Ethical Clothing Australia, Better Cotton Initiative and Fairtrade. Monash is also looking into another exciting initiative in this area.
Computers and electronic equipment – including related conflict minerals
Monash has engaged one of its key computer suppliers and review its approach addressing risks of modern slavery in its supply chain. The supplier was found to be well-advanced in this area.
The supplier has a clear and well-known zero-tolerance approach to modern slavery in its supply chain and is a founding member of the Responsible Business Alliance, a leading global alliance aimed at improved corporate social responsibility within supply chains.
The supplier publishes a Conflict Minerals Report detailing its efforts to purchase processed goods from non-conflict sources, as it has a heavy dependence on third-party manufactured components made from refined, mined minerals.
Though satisfied with the actions of its primary supplier, Monash considers this industry to be of particular risk and will assess, during its forthcoming modern slavery program of work, additional measures to support heightened awareness and transparency of suppliers within this supply chain, with a focus on suppliers other than the primary supplier.
Monash University, in conjunction with the Australian University Procurement Network (AUPN), identified an instance of modern slavery within its supply chain for latex gloves. The following actions were identified as likely being implemented by a recruiting company that was a third party providing labour supply services to an offshore subcontractor to a Monash supplier:
- Deceptive recruiting practices
- High recruitment fees
- Passport withholding
- Forced salary deductions
- Forced overtime
- Substandard living conditions.
The subcontractor took steps to provide financial reparation to the affected migrant unskilled workers and to ensure passports were accessible, and also terminated use of the recruiting company. In addition, Monash’s direct supplier ceased utilising the subcontractor in question.
The AUPN has also discussed alternative remediation techniques that could have been used, instead of simply ceasing to use the subcontractor in question.
In Australia, Monash engages its cleaning staff via well known third-party labour providers that are only engaged after a robust tendering process. Terms and conditions are made binding via comprehensive formal agreements. Further subcontracting of the work is only permitted with the approval of Monash University.
Despite these measures, Monash has identified this to be a particular area of potential modern slavery risk. Though there is no evidence to indicate any issues, as part of its ongoing modern slavery program of work, Monash will undertake a deeper assessment of the industry due to the inherent risk in the wider cleaning industry, and, to ensure a best-in-class approach, may implement changes to further reduce risk in this area such as participation in the Cleaning Accountability Framework.
Continuously reviewing and improving our actions View
The effectiveness of our actions can be assessed at different levels. In subsequent years of our five-year modern slavery program, we will undertake a robust assessment of the effectiveness of our actions, with these reviews reflecting the progressing program of work:
- Internal compliance checks, with checklists designed in conjunction with our academic experts.
- Additional external sector engagement, such as via the Australian Universities Procurement Network (AUPN) and other partnerships that are part of the Monash global ecosystem, to assess effectiveness, combine supplier influence and compare sector and industry performance with our own.
- External stakeholder engagement to continue the dialogue with third parties in relation to risk identification and strategising in relation to identified risk.
- Affected labourers identified as being subject to modern slavery practices – how they are progressing after remediation steps have been taken. This is a longer-term goal.