Marking and grading
Marking and grading
Grading allows student progress to be tracked and compared against their previous work, and within the cohort. It is crucial that the marking process is constructively aligned, equitable, transparent, consistent, and fair.
What is marking, grading and feedback?
Marking is the process of evaluating a piece of work performed or submitted for summative assessment. Grading is the awarding of a specific grade to this work, as a numerical or letter grade.
Marking and grading processes work in conjunction with feedback but they are not synonymous. This means that marking gives students an evaluation of their performance and grading allows them to quantify that performance. Feedback, on the other hand, complements this and assists students in identifying areas of strength or where improvements can be made.
-
Plan for marking and grading
Learn more about considerations for consistent marking and grading including considerations for task design, task description, feedback documents, clear communication, marker expectations and collection of feedback about the task.
-
Ensure consistency and quality in marking
Learn how moderation can ensure assessments are marked fairly and consistently across all markers, modes and teaching locations.
-
Calculate late penalties
Learn how to apply late penalties to assessments with contextualised scenarios demonstrating the correct application of Monash University's late penalty policy and procedure.
-
Address unconscious bias in teaching and assessment
Learn practical ways you can address bias in assessment and teaching, and reduce the risk of personal prejudices affecting your marking.
-
Sessional marking guidelines
Learn more about Monash's sessional marking guidelines and access the Monash University Marking Calculator Landing Page.
Supporting your students
View
Supporting your students to understand the marks, grade, and feedback they receive is crucial to their on-going learning and skills development. This develops students’ feedback literacy. Some students can be quite mark-oriented and the challenge is to focus as much on feedback and improvement as they do on marks. Ongoing academic support helps students to make this transition.
How to support your students
Some ways to support students in understanding the marking before they submit their assessment include:
- Discuss the rubric or marking criteria when presenting the assessment task. This can be done in class, or via a short video.
- Use it to highlight the P and HD criteria and some key differences between them
- Use it to highlight common issues in previous student submissions, or common errors
- Highlight how the rubric criteria align with unit and task learning outcomes, and the relative weightings of criteria.
- Provide opportunities for students to ask questions about the rubric or marking criteria. This can either be time in class (orally or via a polling tool or chat), or via a forum. Ensure questions are answered in a timely manner, and that all students and staff have access to both the questions and the answers.
- Avoid making changes to the task or marking criteria once released, and if changes are made at a late stage, they should not disadvantage those who have been working with the existing rubric.If an error is detected that makes changes unavoidable, ensure the update is announced to all students and staff, with changes highlighted and easily identifiable, as well as providing the rationale for the change. Best practice is to include the date of revision in the document and filename.
- Remind students about the rubric or marking criteria close to the submission date for the task - show them how to use it as a checklist for their own work.
- Develop tasks where students provide peer feedback to each other based on the rubric or marking criteria before the final submission. Ensure sufficient support and/or scaffolding is provided to allow students to develop these important skills in giving and responding to feedback.
- Remind tutors and markers to refer students to learning advisers for academic assistance and support.
Some ways to support students in understanding the marking after they submit their assessment include:
- Provide constructive feedback within the assessment.
- Shift the focus away from grades and marks. It is important in all discussions about tasks to emphasise learning and skill development over grades. For example:
- Instead of saying “An HD student would do…”
Say “A student who has mastered the… would do…” - Instead of saying “In this example that scored 85%...”
Say “In this example the student effectively demonstrated…” - Instead of saying “To get an HD in this assessment task you need to…”
Say “to ensure you have a meaningful understanding of…. you need to…”
- Instead of saying “An HD student would do…”
What resources and services are available to students
The marking process is often the time when skill deficits become most apparent. A student may appear to be doing well, but a struggle with understanding content, academic processes and conventions, academic and/or English language, or key practical skills may only come to light when a submission or performance is marked. The following services can assist students with specific requirements:
Student Academic Success: Learning and Language Support
Encourage students to seek advice from learning and language support about understanding the assessment task. Students can make appointments or attend a drop-in session with a Learning Adviser who can assist them with interpreting and analysing the requirements of assessments. They can also learn about time management, including managing multiple assessment tasks across the semester.
Student Academic Success: Individual consultants with learning advisers
Share this link with students so that they can book in with a learning adviser to gain personal support on how to prepare for timed assessments.
Suite of resources to help students develop their written communication skills, learn new writing strategies and master academic writing. The site also contains annotated assessment samples and resources to write different assessment types.
When students fail
For some students, receiving a fail grade, or even a mark that is lower than expected, can be very upsetting. In high-stakes situations (such as where grades may affect a student’s ability to enter a subsequent course), students may experience significant distress. It is important to be aware of this and to ensure students receive (as a minimum) information about appropriate support.
Health and wellbeing: Counselling service
Share this link for counselling services so that students can obtain additional support around a number of issues from managing motivation, coping with stress and/or anxiety, prioritisation and managing perfectionism. This is a free service for Monash students.
Assessment and results: Special consideration processes
Share this link to let students know how to apply for special consideration that may allow them to obtain an extension, create another assessment, or sit a deferred exam. Monash provides Special Consideration for students who are experiencing exceptional circumstances beyond their control that affect their ability to successfully complete assessment tasks.
Related resources
View
Most written work will be uploaded and submitted online via Moodle. Many formats can be submitted in this way (e.g. videos, posters, infographics, as well as written work). There are a number of technologies you can use for marking and grading. Here are a few key technologies that are part of the Monash suite.
-
Moodle assignments activity
This guide can be used to assess and provide feedback for many types of student work including individual or group submissions, in-class work, online and/or file submissions.
-
Grader interface
This guide allows you to view individual student assignments and provide a grade and in-depth feedback including rich media, such as audio, video and inline files, with the ATTO text editor.
-
Moodle grader report
Moodle grader report is used to record and collate all student marks for the unit. Some grades are automatically populated, e.g. from online quizzes, while others are entered manually as marking is completed.
Other resources related to marking and grading
Here are some additional resources that will help support you in marking and grading student assessments consistently and effectively.
-
Feedback
Learn more about how to provide effective feedback within formative and summative assessment to improve student outcomes and learning.
-
Moodle gradebook
Learn more about how to record student grades and apply weighting within Moodle.
-
Using Moodle rubrics
Moodle rubrics can help you clarify what you expect out of your students by drawing your students' attention to the grading criteria prior to assignment submission.
-
Using Moodle marking guides
Moodle marking guides can help you clarify what you expect out of your students by drawing your students' attention to the grading criteria prior to assignment submission.
-
Using scales in Moodle
Scales are an alternative marking method for when you do not want to use a numerical score, for example a competency scale.
-
Using the Outcomes setting in Moodle
Outcomes can be used to assess and provide additional feedback on students' levels of knowledge or abstract skills.
Relevant policies & procedures
Monash has specific policies and procedures related to marking and grading assessment. Take the time to review these to inform your teaching practice.
-
Marking and feedback procedure
Outlines processes and principles for marking, blind marking, second marking, double marking, provision of feedback, quality assurance, finalising results, responsibilities, and re-marking requests.
-
Assessment regime procedure
Explains requirements of developing and implementing an assessment regime for a unit, rules around scheduling, extensions, hurdles, alternative and supplementary assessments, and communicating assessment requirements.
-
Grading schema procedure
Explains the final grades that are used at Monash in a range of assessment contexts, calculations of WAM, GPA and CGPA, and rules around the use of the withdrawn incomplete (WI) grade.
-
Examinations procedure
Presents rules and processes relating to examination assessment tasks (including eExams), scheduling, deferral, and use of permitted items.
Education Performance Standards Framework
View
The Education Performance Standards identify the expectations of education practice at Monash – See the Education Performance Standards for more details.
Impact on student learning | Impact on educational knowledge | Impact on educational environment | |||||
Effective teaching and learning | Responsive program design | Student- centred orientation | Professional learning engagement | Pedagogical content knowledge | Education research performance | Education innovation | Education leadership |
✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
You could address these Practice Elements by providing evidence of how you:
- lead teaching teams to strengthen marking and grading processes within units to ensure they run smoothly
- design marking approaches to effectively scaffold student learning
- ensure the validity and credibility of Monash qualifications through sound marking
- have created or adapted rubrics in relation to your assessment tasks
- have collaborated with others on rubric development or review including students
- use your disciplinary expertise to strengthen marking and grading practices
- innovate around marking and grading process and practice