Once students have begun the FeedbackFruits activity, you can view analytics and monitor students' progress for each step of the activity. Click through the tabs and click on the hotspots to learn more. You can click the icon in the top right corner to view in fullscreen. Click esc at any time to exit full screen.
This occurs when a student received an average rating higher than 70% and their rating was more than 10% percentage points higher than the overall average of the team as a whole.
Low performer
This occurs when a student did not contribute to the team's success. This condition is triggered when their overall average rating is less than 50%.
Under confident
This occurs when the overall team rating for a student is greater than 60%, but the student rated themselves at least 20% percentage points lower than this. This could indicate that the student is "underconfident" or too critical of their own contributions.
Over confident
This occurs when the overall rating for a student is less than 60%, but the student rated themselves at least 20% percentage points higher than their average rating.
Manipulator
This occurs when a student appears to be trying to "skew the curve" by giving themselves high ratings while rating the other team members poorly. The student has given themselves an overall rating of 80% or higher, while rating all the other members on their team at least 40% percentage points below
this rating (when rating more than 5 peers, we measure the difference using average)
Conflict
This student rated a team-member at 40% or less while the median rating from the rest of the team is 60% or more. This generally indicates that there is a conflict between 2 team members.
Co-conflict
This occurs when a student got rated at 40% or less by one of their team-mates, while the median rating from the rest of the team is 60% or more. This generally indicates that there is a conflict between 2 team members.
Clique
This occurs when it appears the team might have split into two non-cooperating groups, where there’s protective insider rating. This happens when there is significant disagreement between the ratings from various team members (evidenced by standard deviation of the 0-to-1 normalised ratings given by
peers being above 0.23).
Detect outliers
The detect outliers feature flags outliers based on how students rated themselves and their peers so you can quickly identify and review students in teamwork assignments. You can enable this setting in the Given reviews section of the FeedbackFruits Group Member Evaluation activity.
To enable this feature, the following conditions must be met:
Self-assessment is enabled
Students work individually to review in groups
Students review at least 4 peers or 'all' their peers
Allocation method has not been set to ‘students choose who to review’
