My inspiration behind the adoption of Feedback Fruits was my past experience with peer assessment in the contract law units, and student feedback on collaborative assessment with and without a group member evaluation peer assessment tool.
I saw the benefits of having a group member evaluation tool, and how it could obviate some of the disbenefits of collaborative assessment. Without group member evaluation of collaborative assessments, I observed that students raised concerns about free riding and the fact that all members in a group would get the same mark for a collaborative assessment irrespective of their contributions and their collaboration on that assessment task. This led me to do some reading of the literature and gain an understanding of the pedagogical value of having group evaluation of collaborative assessment. This background experience inspired me to bring FeedbackFruits into the contract law units and to assist others in the faculty to use it in their units as best practice where they have collaborative assessment.
For law students, collaboration and communication are Threshold Learning Outcomes of a law degree, which are academic requirements for admission to legal practice. Having FeedbackFruits means that these skills are facilitated through a structured learning and assessment process. Students get feedback on their collaboration and communication, they are assessed on these, and they develop these essential skills.
FeedbackFruits also likely adjusts student behaviour and reduces the problem of free riding because students know that there's an accountability mechanism to address it, so they proactively engage in more positive collaborative behaviours.